Cloning Ourselves: One Librarian’s Experience

Pre= senter: Judith A. Downie, California State University San Marcos

LOEX National Conference, May 4, 2007, San Diego, CA

Presentation Sources

CSU= SM Mediasite http://prawn.csusm.edu (for library examples, click on LIBRARY on left)

Med= iasite http://www.mediasite.com (collection of presentations created with Mediasit= e)

Son= ic Foundry (owns Mediasite) http://www.sonicfoundry.com/

Crosby, O. (2000). Librarians: Information experts in the information age. Occupational Outlook Quarterly 44 (4), 2-15. Retrieved March 29, 2007 from http://www.bls.gov/opub/ooq/2000/Winter/art01.pdf

Gerald, D.E. & Hussar, W. = J. (2000). Projections of education statistics to 2009. Education Statistics Quarterly 1 (4). Retrieved March 29, 2007 = from http://nces.ed.gov/programs/quarterly/vol_1/1_4/6-esq14-a/asp

Selective Bibliography (pedagogy, student learning and instructional technologies)

Bell. S. J. (2002, Spring). Discov= ering cyber-lectures. Library Journal Net Connect 127 (7), 16-18. Retrieved March 29, 2007, from Acad= emic Search Elite database.

<= span style=3D'font-size:11.0pt;font-family:Arial'>Brief discussion of some application, benefits and problems associated with webcasts.

Deme= triadis, S., Triantfillou. E., & Pombortsis, A. (2003). A phenomenographic study= of students’ attitudes towards the use of multiple media for learning. ACM SIGCSE Bulletin 35 (3), 183-187. Retrieved March 30, 2007 from http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/961290.961562.

<= span style=3D'font-size:11.0pt;font-family:Arial'>Discusses students’ perc= eption of different presentation media related to learning styles.

Docherty, K. J. & Faiks, A. H. (2004). Webinar technology: application in libraries. Science & Technology Lib= raries 25 (1/2), 211-26.

<= span style=3D'font-size:11.0pt;font-family:Arial'>Comparison of various web-deli= vered technologies (web-casting, CMS, and others.)

Germ= ain, C. A., Jacobson, T., & Kaczor, S. A. (2000, January). A comparison of the effectiven= ess of presentation formats for instruction: Teaching first-year students. College & R= esearch Libraries 61 (1), 65-72. Retrieved March 29, 2007, from http://www.ala.org/ala/acrl/acrlpubs/crljournal/backissues2000b/january00/g= ermain.pdf. Comparison between live and online instruction finds them equally effective= .

Hara,= N. & Kling, R. (1999). Students' frustrations with a web-based distance education course. First Monday 4 (12). Retrieved Mar= ch 29, 2007, from http://www.firstmonday.org/issues/issue4_12/hara/index.html.

<= span style=3D'font-size:11.0pt;font-family:Arial'>Thorough discussion of the pro= blems students encounter in web-based instruction.

Hogg= an, D. B. (2007, Winter). Surveys: Serious monkey business. SLA San Diego Bulletin 46 (4), 5-7. Retrieved March 29, 2007, from http://units.sla.org/chapter/csnd/bulletins/2007winter.pdf.

<= span style=3D'font-size:11.0pt;font-family:Arial'>Presentation summary about Sur= vey Monkey (online survey tool) and general survey-creation guidelines.

Jepp= eson, B., Dobda, K. & White, P. (2006, November 3). Canned instruction to be ingested anywhere: Delivering library instruction via streaming media. Retrieved March 29, 2007, from http://www.alaodev.org/conferences/presentations/2006/CannedInstructionToBe= IngestedAnywhere.ppt

Keeran, P. (1999, Fall). Build= ing researchers without walls: Web-based instruction for first-year students. Art Documentation 18 (2), 20-1.

Short article offering thinking points for online instruction to first year students. =

Klein, L. R. (2000, Spring). M= edia convergence library-style. Library Journal Net Connect 125 (7= ), 28-30. Retrieved March 29, 2007, from Academic Search Elite database. =

Expl= ains servers and other aspect of adding audio and video to a website.=

Li, Z. (2006). Effectively incorporating instructional m= edia into web-based information literacy. The Electronic = Library 24 (3), 294-306. Retrieved March 29, 2007, from Emeraldinsight database= .

Writ= ten for the librarian creating an online tutorial, the discussion of design and con= tent issues applies to streaming media as well. =

Ladne= r, B., Beagle, D. & Steele, J. R. (2004). Rethinking online instruction: From content transmission to cognitive immersion. Reference & User Services Quarterly 43 (4), 329-37. Retriev= ed March 29, 2007, from Library & Information Science database.

<= span style=3D'font-size:11.0pt;font-family:Arial'>In depth discussion of the cha= nges in pedagogy needed to successfully teach with online instruction. One sugge= sted method is the ‘classroom flip’.

McCl= ure, M. & Munro, K. (2007, January). E-learning spaces: Librarians in course ma= nagement systems. ACRL/Instruction Section Discussion Digest. Retrieved March 29, 20= 07, from http://www.ala.org/ala/acrlbucket/is/conferencesacrl/DiscForum2007MWb.= htm.

<= span style=3D'font-size:11.0pt;font-family:Arial'>Short overview and bibliograph= y of CMS.

Nicho= ls, J., Shaffer, B. & Shockey, K. (2003, September). Changing the face of instruction: Is inline or in-class more effective? College & Research Libraries 64 (5), 378-88. Retrieved March 29, 2007, from http://www.ala.org/ala/acrl/acrlpubs/crljournal/backissues2003b/sept03/nich= ols.pdf. Comparison of live versus online instruction finds student learning and satisfaction to be generally equal.

Ormon= droyd, J. (1998). Course integrated library instruction. Syracuse, N: ERIC Digest. ERIC Clearing= house on Information Resources. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED306960) Retrieved March 29, 2007, from http://www.ericdigests.org/pre-9211/library.= htm.

Notes the increase in workload= to prepare course-integrated instruction

Schneider, K. G. (2001, August). Lights! Camera! Action! American Libraries 32 (7), 94. Retrieved March 29, 2007, from Academic Search El= ite database.

Prov= ides advice on setting up a webinar without special software for staff.

Stoel, L & Lee, K. H. (2003). Modeling the effect of experience on student acceptance of Web-based courseware. Internet Research 13 (5), 364-74. Retrieved March 29, 2007, from Emeraldinsight database.

<= span style=3D'font-size:11.0pt;font-family:Arial'>Study shows students’ le= vel of experience with electronic course tools correlates with comfort and accepta= nce.