|
How racial diversity helps students
to think
by Peter Monaghan
August 4, 2004
When white college students
are placed in discussion groups with a black student -- or with students
holding opinions in the minority -- they display higher levels of complex
thought, and that pattern shows that racial and other forms of diversity
have positive effects on education and thought, write Anthony Brown, an assistant professor of education at Stanford University, and
five colleagues.
At a time of legal
challenges to affirmative action, the finding in social and personality
psychology has important policy implications, the authors suggest. Previous
research, they say, has collected anecdotal evidence that racially diverse
educational environments lead to better student retention, better views by
students of their intellectual and social status, and greater satisfaction
with college attendance.
But their work, the
researchers say, is the first controlled, randomized study to show those
effects in experiments designed to directly measure cognitive outcomes.
Their yardstick for improved thinking was integrative complexity, measured
through essays written at the beginning and end of the testing. At the
highest level of integrative complexity, "there is recognition of the
trade-offs among perspectives and solutions," and earlier studies have shown
that it is associated with higher grades in college, the authors write.
In the study, students in
groups of three white participants and one black or white collaborator
discussed contentious social issues.
The researchers found that
conditions of racial diversity increased integrative complexity -- as, to a
lesser extent, did the presence of a student whose opinions on the topics
under discussion were at odds with those of the other participants.
Although homogeneity of
group members may increase solidarity and cohesiveness, it also tends to
increase "groupthink," the authors say. By contrast, "minority influence"
leads to more-divergent thinking and perspectives, better critical thinking,
and willingness and ability to change.
The Chronicle of Higher Education
Page 1 |