Jump to Content


GEL 101 Library Module (Kornher)

Toni Olivas
Education Librarian
KEL 3427
tolivas@csusm.edu
760-750-4333

Office Hours:
Mon. 3-4pm
Thurs. 9-10am

*By appointment and drop-ins welcome as well


What is the GEL Library Module?

The Library Module will introduce you to the basics of college-level research.
The skills you learn during the module will help you for 2 main reasons:

  • specifically, for the research project and presentation you will do
    in this class.
  • in general, for the papers and projects you will be expected to do
    for the rest of your college career.

     

By the time you finish the Library Module, you will be able to:

  • Identify the information you need

  • Find the information effectively and efficiently
  • Evaluate the information retrieved critically
  • Use the information to create new information (your assignments)
  • Behave with an awareness of the ethical and legal issues regarding information use

LEARNING OUTCOME:

--Examine and compare information from various sources in order to evaluate reliability, validity, accuracy, authority, timeliness, and point of view or bias

 

Schedule, Topics and Assignments

The Library Module covers a lot of information in only 9 classes, so attendance and participation are mandatory. Students who are excessively or regularly late will not receive credit for attendance.

Appropriate classroom behavior is required (e.g. no iPods, text messaging, eating, etc).

Each in-class activity and homework assignment is for credit and must be completed on time.
No late work will be accepted without prior approval.

 In-class activities/attendance  70 pts
 Homework assignments  50 pts
 Final annotated bibliography assignment  20 pts
 Quiz  10 pts
 Total  150 points

Note: The Office of Disabled Student Services provides a variety of services and resources to students. Students with disabilities should contact me immediately to ensure appropriate accommodations are made during the Library Module.
 

Day 1- Sept 11

Expectations and discussion of Final Annotated Bibliography
Intro to college level research (from UW-Madison Libraries)
What is an Annotated Bibliography?
Advanced internet searching
In-class activity #1: Evaluating websites    

Day 2- Sept 13

REVIEW
In-class activity #2 Groups
Homework assignment #1 (Posted to WebCT)   

Day 3- Sept 14

Final Annotated Bibliography due in 2 weeks
REVIEW
In-class activity #3 Narrowing your topic & working thesis statement
Concepts & Identify keywords

Homework assignment #2: (Posted to WebCT)                              

Day 4- Sept 18

REVIEW Thesis & Annotated Bibliography
Finding articles
Database search techniques 
In-class activity #4: Final "Strong" Thesis Statement
Homework assignment #3 (Posted to WebCT)

Day 5- Sept 20

No Class
"In-class activity" #5: Popular vs. scholarly articles
Homework assignment #4 (Posted to WebCT)

Day 6- Sept 21

Citing sources
 In-class activity #6: APA Citation Practice
REMINDER: Final Annotated Bibliography Due Oct. 1st
No Homework Today

Day 7- Sept 25   *meet in KEL 3400

Finding books   
Library call #s and subject headings  
Finding articles
In-class activity #7
Homework assignment #5 (Book or Newspaper)

Day 8- Sept 27   *meet in KEL 3400

Pulling it all together
Effective PowerPoint Presentations
In-class activity #8 Review for quiz

Day 9- Sept 28   *meet in KEL 3400

ANNOTATED BIBLIOGRAPHY assignment due Monday!
Plagiarism and academic honesty
Quiz (Available in WebCT only)
Module evaluation

 

 




Advanced internet searching

Search Engines Subject Directories
Compiled by computer "spiders" that "crawl" the web, constantly adding websites Compiled by people, selectively adding websites
"More is better" or "Quick and easy" "Less is more" or "Quality, not quantity"
Websites often listed by popularity or paid sponsors Websites often listed by subject categories
BEST FOR:
  • very specific searches (e.g. person or org.)
  • phrase searches (e.g. "Martin Luther King Jr")
  • you know exactly what you're looking for

BEST FOR:
  • broad topic or concept searches
  • need background information (e.g. history of, types of)
  • you're not sure what you're looking for
Try out: Try out:

Top





Evaluating websites

From your own Internet searching, you probably realize there is an overwhelming amount of information available online. You might feel comfortable searching online-- but doing a Google search and using the first few results for your paper does not constitute college research!

Anyone can put up a website. How do you know that its information is accurate, legitimate or current? Learn how to evaluate a web site before choosing to include the information you find in your research project.

Ask yourself these questions:

1. Who made this site?
2. What is its purpose?
3. Where does the information come from?
4. How current is the website?

In-class activity: Log in to WebCT (available only during class)

 

Top




 

Identifying keywords

For any research topic, you must first think of alternative keywords (synonyms) to search for.
Let's say your topic is how blind people are treated. You need to search for different combinations of keywords:

blind  AND treatment  
visually impaired stereotyp* (e/es/ical)
disabled social perceptions
handicapped myths


In-class activity:
Log in to WebCT (available only during class)

Top

 



Finding books

Find books by searching the Library Catalog. A good strategy is to:

Enter a keyword or two housing and Hispanic
bilingual education
gender and role
Scan the list for one good
title of interest

'Clear and convincing evidence: measurement of discrimination in America'

'
The Hispanic child: speech, language, culture, and education'
'Gender and domestic life : changing practices in families and households'
 
Click on the subject
headings
for that
book
Discrimination In Housing United States
Education Bilingual

Sex role -- United States -- History

Top




 

Citing sources

For every college paper and project, you will need to document where you got ideas and quotations from (see Academic Honesty below).

There are different ways, or styles, of citing your sources-- including styles from the American Psychological Association (APA), Modern Language Association (MLA), and Chicago Manual of Style.

For every source you use in your paper, you need to include a citation in your list of references. Most sources need the following information:

  • Author(s)

  • Title (of article, book, journal...)

  • Publication information (when it was published, by what publisher, in what journal, volume, etc)

 

Book Cover APA: Publication manual of the American Psychological Association.  5th ed. Washington, DC : American Psychological Association, 2001.

Try KnightCite, a free online citation tool to help create your bibliography.

In order for the citation to be accurate, you will still need to understand the difference between a journal and magazine, volume and issue number, and so on.
You will need to review the results for accuracy.

Top




 

Writing an Evaluative Annotated Bibliography

For most college papers and projects, you will need to investigate and report on the scholarly research related to your topic-- in other words, establishing what has already been said. To do this, you must read and evaluate each of your sources with the following 4 points:

  1. Cite source in APA style.

  2. What are the qualifications of the author?

  3. Brief description: What is the main idea of the source?

  4. Add your own evaluative commentary: Do you agree/disagree and why?

An annotated bibliography includes a citation (in proper APA style depending on type of material) AND review (responding to the above questions in complete, well-written sentences) for each of your sources.
 

Points of critical review Sample formats and explanations
1. Citation

Where did the source
come from?
 
Author, A., & Author, B. (Year). Title of article. Title of periodical, volume         
     (issue), pg-pg.

Depending on type of material (e.g. article, book, website), give full citation
in APA style. Try KnightCite, a free online citation tool.
 
2. Qualification of author(s)

Why should you trust what
the author has to say?

If the author is an organization
or company, what do you know
about them?

(1 sentence)
SAMPLE FORMAT

Dr.____ is a professor of [subject] at the University of ____.
                  researcher

____ is a staff writer for [title of] newspaper
              reporter                     magazine.
              journalist

____ is a non-profit organization that does the following ____.
              company
              government agency
 

NOTES
  • A professor/researcher has a PhD and is an expert in their field.
  • A journalist/staff writer is a generalist (writing about any current topic), not an expert.
  • An organization may conduct research or disseminate knowledge to further their cause.
  • A company is for-profit, and might be trying to sell something.
3. Main purpose

What are the key points/
main ideas of the source?

 
(1-2 sentences)
SAMPLE FORMAT

This scholarly article proves ____.                 This newspaper shows ____.
       book                                                           magazine
                                                                         website
The main point of this source is ____.
      key idea


NOTES

You might note if the source has a strong bias or point of view:

The author(s) have a biased opinion on ____, because of ____.
      organization       balanced
      company           well-researched

  • Bias is a point of view that is one-sided, based on opinion rather than     research, and without consideration of the "sides" of an issue.

  • A viewpoint (e.g. hypothesis or thesis) that is based in research is not   biased... the research has proven their point!

4. Evaluative Comment

Do you agree/disagree with the source and why?
 
SAMPLE FORMAT

You might mention specifically how the source supports (or doesn't support) your research:

This source provides historical background that prove ____.
                              statistics                         disprove
                              case studies                    demonstrate
                              quotes
                              opposing viewpoints
 

Sample annotated bibliography from: Trinity University Coates Library website http://lib.trinity.edu/research/citing/annobibs.shtml

Helfand, J. (2001). Screen: Essays on graphic design, new media, and visual culture.
     New York: Princeton Architectural Press.

Helfand’s collection of essays (previously published in Eye magazine) focuses on how technological sophistication and the power of online communications have changed the manner in which computer users perceive, critique, and embrace visual and auditory design on the World Wide Web. Her subtle thesis suggests, however, that most web “denizens” ignore the impact of design during online expeditions---unless the design imposes itself between the users and their goal. The author’s experience as a visual/virtual designer leads her to offer a critical review of how the ease of electronic design (due to prefabricated software templates) may not necessarily result in the most efficient design for web audiences, and that while contemporary web designers may possess a functional design literacy, they are not equipped with the kind of critical literacy that will lead to aesthetic and performative innovations. Helfand argues that web designers should pay greater attention to the development and influence of aural design as well as the visual if they are to remain in step with their online audiences, although the years following the publication of the text suggest that the influence of aural design may still remain ahead.  Helfand's arguments have merit and her concepts inspire the reader to continue thinking on the topic. However, the lack of a bibliography or research beyond her own analysis make the text only moderately appropriate in relation to a scholarly project.

Top



 

Scholarly vs Popular articles

Journal articles include the latest research in the field. To find articles, you need to start with a research database.  Each will allow you to search hundreds or even thousands of journals at once by searching for keywords relevant to your topic. Databases can have BOTH scholarly and non-scholarly articles.
 

 

Scholarly (peer-reviewed, refereed, empirical)

Non-scholarly (popular)

Audience

academic readers

general audience

Author

researchers, experts, specialists

journalists, free-lance writers, generalists

Vocabulary

professional jargon; may be difficult to read

common; easy to understand

Structure

specific structure (e.g. abstract, methodology, data, results, conclusion, references)

structured like a story; can look glossy with pictures and ads; comparatively shorter

Sources

long list of bibliography, references, footnotes

no bibliography or references listed

Examples Ethnic and Racial Studies; Gender & Society; International Migration Review; American Journal of Public Health; Latin American Perspectives Time; Newsweek; Business Week;
US News & World Report; New York Times; Christian Science Monitor


Some databases provide a 'peer-reviewed' or 'scholarly only' limit function that can narrow the results, but will still bring back non-scholarly materials that were published in a scholarly journal (e.g., editorials, letters to the editor, book reviews.) When in doubt, ask a librarian!

Top




 

Finding articles

Journals articles include the latest research in the field. To find articles, you need to start with a research database.  Each will allow you to search hundreds or even thousands of journals at once by searching for keywords relevant to your topic.

The following databases are useful for this class. Try searching for keywords related to your topic:

Most Useful


Academic Search Premier
Magazines, Newspapers, Academic Journals (Limit your results by clicking 'Scholarly/Peer Reviewed')

ERIC
Good source for sociological and educational topics (Click 'Journal articles only' for scholarly articles).

LexisNexis
Great news source: Newspapers, newsletters and magazines (all full-text but no scholarly/peer reviewed articles)

CQ Researcher
Good for 'sides' of a hot topic and statistics

PsycINFO
Available via EbscoHost: A comprehensive international database of psychology, covering the academic, research, and practice literature in psychology from over 45 countries in more than 30 languages.

Sociological Abstracts
Use 'Thesaurus Search' to find descriptors for your topic.
Click 'Journal articles only' for scholarly articles.

JSTOR
Use the 'Advanced Search' to limit disciplines and article type.

Blackwell
Blackwell includes over 800 journals in Arts, Business, Health Sciences Humanities, Social Behavioral Sciences, and Science and Technology.

Sage Journals Online
Sage Journals Online includes over 460 journals in Business, Humanities, Social Sciences, and Science, Technology and Medicine.

Newspapers
A selected list of resources for finding news and newspapers, also called "popular press" or media coverage.

NOTE: Depending on your topic, other databases might be more relevant.
You can choose a
database by subject.



Think you can find all this stuff on the Internet? Not for free!

See an article you want in one of these databases?

  1. Look for "Full Text" in pdf PDF, HTML Full TextHTML, Linked Full TextLinked or  Check SFX for Availability
  2. If all else fails, fill out an Interlibrary Loan article request form. You'll get it within 5-10 days for FREE.
  3. Or, any time you need help, ask a librarian!

Top



Academic honesty

What is academic honesty?

A major principle of higher education is student development of critical thinking skills and original scholarship. According to our Academic Honesty Policy: "The integrity of this academic institution, and the quality of the education provided in its degree programs, are based on the principle of academic honesty."

Academic honesty includes:

  • accurate use and representation of quotations.
  • explicit citation of sources when paraphrasing and describing ideas or any aspect of the work of others.
  • all forms of academic work-- exams, papers, presentations, and other projects.

To best understand academic honesty, you must know what is considered dishonest, or academic misconduct.
Plagiarism and other forms of cheating are defined here in the General University Catalog. pdf

 

Related resources:

  What is it? Tips
Quoting Using the author's exact words. Always cite it and use "quotation marks." Some good reasons to include a quote are:  
  • You want to support or add credibility to your arguments
  • The original is difficult to rephrase
  • The original is so good that you want to preserve the language

Quoting in moderation is acceptable, but stringing a bunch of quotes together without analysis and well-crafted transitions is bad. A paper is supposed to be your work, so limit quoting to the minimum needed as per the above reasons.
 

Summarizing Condensing the author's words or ideas without altering the meaning or providing interpretation—you use your own words for this. Basically, presenting the original information in a nutshell.

When you summarize, you must always cite the author of the material you are summarizing.
In academic writing, there are a few things to keep in mind when summarizing outside sources:
  • Use your own words
  • Include the key relevant elements of the original and keep it brief—you're just going for the original's essence
  • Do not include your interpretation/analysis within the summary—make a clear distinction between your thoughts and someone else's
  • Vary how you introduce or attribute your sources, like "according to…," or "so-and-so concludes that..." so your readers don't get bored
  • Always include a citation.

 

Paraphrasing Restating, in your own words, the author's words or ideas without altering the meaning or providing interpretation. Paraphrases are about the same length as the original.


When you paraphrase, you must always cite the author of the material you are paraphrasing.
Paraphrasing is similar to summarizing in that you: Paraphrasing differs from summarizing in that you:
  • Do NOT include your interpretation/analysis within the paraphrase—make a clear distinction between your thoughts and someone else's
  • Should vary how you introduce or attribute your sources, like "according to…," or "so-and-so concludes that..."
  • Always include a citation

 

  • Usually write about the same length as the original
  • Use your own words, but you may occasionally want to include a sequence of words or a brief quote from the original (Remember to use "quotation marks" if you decide to include any sequence of words from the original.)

 

Top



 

Effective PowerPoint design

Even the most exciting research needs to be communicated in an effective presentation. PowerPoint is used to convey information in an interesting and visually pleasing fashion.

Your PowerPoint is NOT to prove your research—that is why you are handing in a paper. Instead, HIGHLIGHT and focus the most important points of your work. Succinct and straightforward presentations will be more impressive than ones with lots of jargon and statistics.

Keep in mind:

  SIMPLICITY

 
  • When slides are cluttered with words, bullets and statistics, the audience will be too busy reading to pay attention to you.
  • The rule of thumb is "6 by 6": no more than 6 lines of text and 6 words per line per slide.
  • No more than one topic per slide. This will also help you resist reading right off the screen.
  • Go easy on the special effects, animation, charts, tables and clip art.
  • DO select powerful images. A picture can be worth a thousand words.
     

 AESTHETICS

 
  • Is the background too busy or distracting?
  • Can the audience clearly distinguish the slide colors?
    Typically light colored fonts against darker backgrounds are easy for the audience to read.
  • Is the font large enough and easy to read?
    Use font size, style and color to emphasize titles or major points.
  • Overall, is the presentation professional looking and visually appealing?
  • Remember the importance of non-verbal communication-- good posture and eye contact gives you more credibility.

 

  TIMING

 
  • How long is the allotted presentation time? Are there enough slides or too many?
    PRACTICE beforehand to time the speaker and slides accordingly.
  • Repetition = Retention. Make your main point or argument clear in the beginning, support it during your presentation, and recap before the show is over.
  • A group member can be responsible for keeping track of time and moving things along.
    You don't want to spend too much time elaborating on some points or slides, and then have to race through the remainder of your presentation.

 


Additional PowerPoint design resources from:


 

Need more help?

Don't hesitate to contact me for research help.

Top